Free Case Review
Free Case Review

Free & Confidential Consultation

What You Can Expect: At 1-800-LAW-FIRM, you can count on affordable pricing with zero hidden fees and 100% transparency into our legal process. Your experienced legal professional will provide you with an honest evaluation of your issue which will enable you to make educated decisions regarding the options available to you.


Terror Victims vs. Social Media Giants

Pulse Nightclub Shooting Survivors and Victims’ Family Members v. Google, Twitter and Facebook

On June 12,, 2016, a man with an assault rifle entered a popular gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida and perpetrated what is now known as the deadliest mass shooting in US History. The attack, carried out by a 29-year-old American ISIS recruit named Omar Mateen, resulted in 49 deaths and 53 wounded.

Mateen was radicalized by consuming ISIS propaganda that was readily available on YouTube (Google), Twitter and Facebook. He identified himself as an Islamic soldier and pledged his allegiance to the Islamic State while on a call with police negotiators during the Pulse Nightclub attack. Mateen was later gunned down by police officers at the scene of the attack.

On December 19, 2016, the grieving families of three Pulse nightclub shooting victims filed a lawsuit naming Google, Facebook and Twitter as defendants for providing material support to the terrorist group, ISIS. On March 31, 2017, six more grieving family members along with four survivors joined the lawsuit.

The lawsuit names the families of the late 23-year-old Stanley Almodovar III, 25-year-old Tevin Crosby, 22-year-old Juan Guerrero, 40-year-old Javier Jorge-Reyes, 19-year-old Jason Josaphat, 32-year-old Christopher Leinonen, 35-year-old Jean Carlos Mendez Perez, 24-year-old Christopher Sanfeliz, and 22-year-old Luis Vielma as plaintiffs. Included in the lawsuit are also four survivors of the attack, Asael Abad, Jillian Amador, Christopher Littlestar and Nicholas Perez. Representing the families and survivors are Keith Altman and Ari Kresch of 1-800-LAW-FIRM of Southfield, Michigan.

The complaint includes intelligence that in addition to providing ISIS with a platform to radicalize, recruit and plan attacks, Google, Twitter and Facebook are using ISIS’ posts to create new content. This content is created by combining ISIS posts with advertisements selected by the defendants. Once these posts and advertisements are combined, this newly created content is being served to specific viewers who have a propensity towards that particular content.

Gonzalez v. Google, Twitter and Facebook

Among the 130 murdered in the November 2015 Paris attacks was 23-year-old Nohemi Gonzalez. It was an act of terror that reverberated worldwide, both in unity for the victims and their families, and in fear of the fastest growing terrorist movement to date: ISIS.

In recent years, ISIS has achieved a level of prosperity that would have been virtually unattainable without the aid of social media platforms, namely Facebook, Twitter, and Google’s YouTube. ISIS and other emerging terrorist groups depend on these Western social media platforms to coordinate attacks, recruit new members, disseminate propaganda, and raise funds. Together with 1-800-LAW-FIRM, Nohemi Gonzalez’s grieving father, Reynaldo Gonzalez, is bringing a lawsuit against said social media giants for providing material support that contributed to the wildfire growth of ISIS, and ultimately, to the murder of his daughter.

As a platform for global communication, these social networks are used to organize and inspire acts of terror and violence, claiming countless innocent lives—including but not limited to those in Paris, and more recently in Orlando. What’s more, is that while they say they are making every effort to curtail this type of terrorist activity, Facebook, Twitter and Google still generate ads associated with these posts and collect the revenue. In at least the case of YouTube, part of that revenue may even be shared with the terrorists themselves through Google’s AdSense program.

In June 2014, Reynaldo Gonzalez filed a lawsuit in federal court naming Google, Twitter and Facebook as defendants for providing material support to the terrorist group ISIS. This lawsuit alleges that the defendants knowingly permitted ISIS to use their platforms for recruiting purposes, spreading propaganda and raising funds to carry-out terror attacks. Defending Mr. Gonzalez are Ari Kresch and Keith Altman of 1-800-LAW-FIRM. Read the full complaint here.

In the words of Nohemi Gonzalez’s grieving father, Reynaldo, “How many more innocent people need to die before Google, Facebook and Twitter are prohibited from making money off of terrorist propaganda? It is bad enough that I lost my daughter at the prime of her life, but to think that she died in vain is even more disturbing. I filed this lawsuit to save others from terrorists that rely on social media to plan their attacks on innocent people.” Though nothing can ever undo the tragedy that the Gonzalez family has endured, Gonzalez is hopeful that this lawsuit will prevent future tragedies in which Facebook, Twitter and Google are accomplices to ISIS.


Understand Your Legal Options

If you or someone you know was injured or killed in an act of terrorism, you may wish to explore your legal options. Our attorneys are at the forefront of this litigation and will fight for the justice you and your loved ones deserve. Complete the form on this page or call 1-800-529-3476 to speak with an expert.

Stay Informed

Sign up for our free enewsletter to receive updates on subjects that matter to you most.

I am Interested In: (Select All That Apply)

The information on this site is ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. The material provided is strictly for general informational purposes and does not imply the formation of a lawyer-client relationship nor should it be considered as legal advice. 1-800-LAW-FIRM strives to ensure that all information provided is accurate and complete, but does not guarantee the information is accurate and complete. Prior outcomes of other lawsuits by 1-800-LAW-FIRM or other law firms, does not guarantee a similar result.